Nicholas J. Spykman, “Geography and Foreign Policy, I”, The American Political Science Review, 32 (1), 1938, 28-50. 
|
Nicholas J. Spykman, “Geography and Foreign Policy, II”, The American Political Science Review, 32 (2), 1938, 213-236.
|
Albert Wohlstetter, “The Delicate Balance of Terror”, Foreign Affairs, 37 (2) (1939): 211-234.
|
Alexander Wendt, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, American Political Science Review, 88 (2), 1944, 384-396.
|
X (George F. Kennan),“The Sources of Soviet Conduct”, Foreign Affairs, 25 (4) (1947): 566—82.
|
Arnold Wolfers, “ ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, 67 (4), 1952, 481-502.
|
Hans J. Morgenthau, “Another ‘Great Debate’: The National Interest of the United States”, The American Political Science Review, XLVI (4) (1952): 961-988.
|
Ernest B. Haas, “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda”, World Politics, 5 (4), 1953, 442-477.
|
Stanley H. Hoffmann, “International Relations: The Long Road to Theory”, World Politics, 11 (3), 1959, 346-377.
|
Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Stability of a Bipolar World”, Daedalus, 93 (3) (1964): 881-909.
|
Andre Beanfre, “The Sharing of Nuclear Responsibilities: A Problem in Need of Solution”, International Affairs, 41 (3) (1965): 411—19.
|
Hedley Bull, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach”, World Politics, 18 (3), 1966, 361-377.
|
Henry A. Kissinger, “Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy”, Daedalus, 95 (2), 1966, 503-529.
|
Hedley Bull, “Strategic Studies and Its Critics”, World Politics, 20 (4) (1968): 593-605.
|
Hedley Bull, “Arms Control and World Order”, International Security, 1 (1) (1976): 3-16.
|
Stanley H. Hoffmann, “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, 106 (3), 1977, 41-60.
|
Jack L. Snyder, “Rationality at the Brink: The Role of Cognitive Processes in Failures of Deterrence”, World Politics, 30 (3) (1978): 345—65.
|
Robert Jervis, “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, 30 (2) (1978): 167-214.
|
Robert Jervis, “Why Nuclear Superiority Doesn’t Matter”, Political Science Quarterly, 94 (4) (1979-80): 617—33.
|
Colin S. Gray, “Strategic Stability Reconsidered”, Dædalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 109 (4) (1980): 135-534.
|
John J. Weltman, “Managing Nuclear Multipolarity”, International Security, 6 (3) (1981-82): 182—94.
|
Robert W. Cox, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 1981, 126-155.
|
| Carl Sagan, “Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe: Some Policy Implications”, Foreign Affairs, 62 (2) (1983-84): 257-92. |
Jack S. Levy, “Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems”, World Politics, 36 (1), 1983, 76-99.
|
Richard H. Ullman, “Redefining Security”, International Security, 8 (1) (1983): 129-53.
|
Robert Jervis, “Deterrence and Perception”, International Security, 7 (3), 1983, 3-30.
|
Robert W. Cox, “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12 (2), 1983, 162-175.
|
| Barry Buzan, “Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case”, International Organization, 38 (4) (1984): 597—624. |
Barry Buzan, “Peace, Power and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations”, Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), 1984, 109-125.
|
Charles L. Glaser, “Why Even Good Defenses may be Bad”, International Security, 9 (2) (1984): 92-123.
|
Jack S. Levy, “The Offensive/Defensive Balance of Military Technology: A Theoretical and Historical Analysis”, International Studies Quarterly, 28(2) (1984): 219-38.
|
Johan Galtung, “Transarmament: From Offensive to Defensive Defense”, Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2) (1984): 127-39.
|
Mohammed Ayoob, “Security in the Third World: The Worm About to Turn”, International Affairs, 60 (1) (1984): 41—51.
|
Kenneth A. Oye,”Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies”, World Politics, 38 (1), 1985, 1-24.
|
Robert Axelrod ve Robert O. Keohane, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”, World Politics, 38 (1), 226-254.
|
Michael W.Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics”, The American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1986, 1151-1169.
|
Jack S. Levy, “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War”, World Politics, 40 (1), 1987, 82-107.
|
Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18 (4), 1988, 615-628.
|
Robert Gilpin, “The Theory of Hegemonic War”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18 (4), 1988, 591-613.
|
Simon Dalby, “Geopolitical Discourse: The Soviet Union As Other”, Alternative, XIII (4) (1988): 415-42.
|
William S. Lind, Nightengale, Keith, Schmitt, John F., Sutton, Joseph W. and Wilson, Gary I., “The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation”, Marine Corps Gazette, (Oct. 1989), 22–6.
|
Bradley S. Klein, “How the West was One: Representational Politics of NATO”, International Studies Quarterly, 34 (3) (1990): 311-325.
|
Bruce M. Russett, Thomas Risse-Kappen, John Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future, Part III: Realism and Realities of European Security”, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 3, Winter 1990/91, pp 216-222.
|
Daniel Dendney, “The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19 (3) (1990): 461—76.
|
John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War”, International Security, 15 (1), 1990, 5-56.
|
Joseph S. Nye, Jr, “Soft Power”, Foreign Policy, 80: 153—71.
|
R.B.J. Walkers, “Security, Sovereignty, and the Challenge of World Politic”, Alternatives, XV (1) (1990): 3-27.
|
Stanley Hoffman, Robert O. Keohane, John Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future, Part II: International Relations Theory and Post Cold War Europe”, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1990, pp. 191-199.
|
Ken Booth, “Security and Emancipation?”, Review of International Studies, 17 (4) (1991): 313—26.
|
Stephen M. Walt, “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 35 (2) (1991): 211—39.
|
Thomas Risse-Kappen, “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies”, World Politics, 43 (4), 1991, 479-512.
|
Edward A. Kolodziej, “Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector”, International Studies Quarterly, 36 (4) (1992): 421-38.
|
James M. Goldgeier and Michael McFaul, “A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era”, International Organization, 46 (2) (1992): 467—91.
|
Woosang Kim, “Power Transitions and Great Power War from Westphalia to Waterloo”, World Politics, 45 (1), 1992, 153-172.
|
Barry R. Posen, “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict”, Survival, 35 (1) (1993): 27—47.
|
| Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security, 18 (2) (1993): 44—79. |
Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs, 72 (3) (1993): 22—49.
|
Antulio J. Echevarria II, “War and Politics: The Revolution in Military Affairs and the Continued Relevance of Clausewitz”, Joint Forces Quarterly (Winter 1995–96), 76–80.
|
Christopher Bassford and Edward J. Villacres, “Reclaiming the Clausewitzian Trinity”, Parameters, 20 (3) (Autumn 1995), 9–19.
|
David A. Baldwin, “Security Studies and the End of the Cold War”, World Politics, 48 (1) (1995): 117-41.
|
Emma Rothschild, “What is Security”, Dædalus, 124 (3) (1995): 53-98.
|
John A. Vasquez, “Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction or Territoriality”, Journal of Peace Research, 32 (3), 1995, 277-293.
|
Richard Price, “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo”, International Organization, 49 (1) (1995): 73-103.
|
Barry R. Posen and Andrew L. Ross, “Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy”, International Security, 21 (3) (1996—97): 5—53.
|
Bill McSweeney, “Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School”, Review of International Studies, 22 (1) (1996): 81—93.
|
Jutta Weldes, “Constructing National Interests”, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (3) (1996): 275-318.
|
| K.M. Fierke, “Multiple Identities, Interfacing Games: The Social Construction of Western Action in Bosnia”, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (4) (1996): 467-97. |
Keith Krause, “Insecurity and State Formation in the Global Military Order: The Middle Eastern Case”, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (3) (1996): 319—54.
|
Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams, “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods”, Mershon International Studies Review, 40 (2) (1996): 229-54.
|
Emanuel Adler, “Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26 (2) (1997): 249-77.
|
John L. Gaddis, “History, Theory and Common Ground”, International Security, 22 (1), 1997, 75-85.
|
Richard K. Betts, “Should Strategic Studies Survive?”, World Politics, 50 (1) (1997): 7-33.
|
Charles A. Kupchan, “After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity”, International Security, 23 (2) (1998): 40—79.
|
Lawrence Freedman, ‘The Changing Forms of Military Conflict’, Survival, 40 (4) (Winter 1998/99), 39–56.
|
Michael C. Williams, “Identity and the Politics of Security”, European Journal of International Relations, 4 (2) (1998): 204—25.
|
Astri Subrke, “Human Security and the Interests of States”, Security Dialogue, 30 (3) (1999): 265—76.
|
Michael Howard, “When Are Wars Decisive?”, Survival, 41 (1) (Spring 1999), 126–35.
|
Robert Jevis, “Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate”, International Security, 24 (1), 1999, 42-63.
|
Samuel P. Huntington ‘The Lonely Superpower’, Foreign Affairs, 78 (2) (1999): 35—49.
|
Daniel Philpott, “The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations”, World Politics, 52 (2), 2000, 206-245.
|
Kenneth N. Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security, 25 (1), 2000, 5-41.
|
Lene Hansen ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29 (2) (2000): 285-306.
|
William Walker ‘Nuclear Order and Disorder, International Affairs, 76 (4) (2000): 703—24.
|
Caroline Thomas ‘Global Governance, Development and Human Security: Exploring the Links’, Third World Quarterly, 22 (2) (2001): 159-75.
|
Roland Paris ‘Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air’, International Security, 26 (2) (2001): 87—102.
|
Didier Bigo ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critigue of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives, 27 (Special Issue) (2002): 63-92.
|
Robert Kagan ‘Power and Weakness’, Policy Review, 113 (2002): 3-28.
|
Beril Dedeoğlu, “Yeniden Güvenlik Topluluğu: Benzerliklerin Karşıklı Bağımlılığından Farklılıkların Birlikteliğine”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (4) 2004, 1-21.
|
Fulya A. Ereker, “İlkçağlardan Günümüze Haklı Savaş Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (3) 2004, 1-36.
|
Gilles Andréani ‘The “War on Terror”: Good Cause, Wrong Concept’, Survival, 46 (4) (2004-05): 31-50.
|
J. Ann Tickner ‘Feminist Responses to International Security Studies’, Peace Review, 16 (1) (2004): 43-48.
|
Mustafa Aydın, “Uluslararası İlişkilerin ‘Gerçekçi’ Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (1) 2004, 33-60.
|
Robert L. Paarlberg ‘Knowledge as Power: Science, Military Dominance, and U.S. Security’, International Security, 29 (1) (2004): 122—51.
|
Tarak Barkawi ‘On the Pedagogy of “Small Wars’, International Affairs, 80 (1) (2004): 19-37.
|
James Der Derian ‘Imaging Terror: Logos, Pathos and Ethos’, Third World Quarterly, 26 (1) (2005): 23-37.
|
Sezai Özçelik, “The Theory And Practice Of Preventive Diplomacy: The Case Of Preventive Deployment In Macedonia”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3 (11) 2006, 103-128.
|
A. Şevket Ovalı, “Ütopya ile Pratik Arasında: Uluslararası İlişkilerde İnsan Güvenliği Kavramsallaştırılması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3 (10) 2006, 3-52.
|
Mark Neocleous ‘From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order’, Security Dialogue, 37 (3) (2006): 363—84.
|
Muzaffer Ercan Yılmaz, “Third-Party Intervention in International Conflicts: Peacekeeping and Peacemaking in the Post-Cold War Era”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3 (11) 2006, 25-44.
|
Stefan Elbe ‘Should HIV/AIDS Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security’, International Studies Quarterly, 50 (1) (2006): 119—144.
|
Ali Karaosmanoğlu, “Muhteşem Ortaklık: Kant ve Clausewitz,” Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 161-183.
|
Faruk Yalvaç, “Rousseau’nun Savaş ve Barış Kuramı: Adalet Olarak Barış”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 121-160.
|
Friedrich Kratochwil, “Re-thinking the ‘inter’ in International Politics”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35 (3), 2007, 495-511.
|
Hidemi Suganami, “Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt”, International Studies, 33 (3), 2007, 511-530.
|
Muzaffer Ercan Yılmaz, “Westphalia’dan Günümüze Savaş”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 17-38.
|
Necati Polat, “Türkiye’de Barış Düşüncesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 217-253.
|
Richard Falk, “War and Peace in an Age of Terror and State Terrorism”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 1-15.
|
Serdar Palabıyık, “Türkiye’de Savaş Düşüncesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 4 (14) 2007, 185-215.
|
Barry Buzan, “Askeri Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 07-123.
|
Björn Hettne, “Teori ve Pratikte Güvenliğin Bölgeselleşmesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 87-106.
|
Czeslaw Mesjasz, “Ekonomik Güvenlik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 125-150.
|
Haldun Yalçınkaya, “Savaşlarda Asker-Medya İlişkilerinin Geldiği Son Aşama: İliştirilmiş Gazetecilik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (19) 2008, 29-56.
|
Hans Günter Brauch, “Güvenliğin Yeniden Kavramsallaştırılması: Barış, Güvenlik, Kalkınma ve Çevre Kavramsal Dörtlüsü”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 1-47.
|
John Baylis, “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güvenlik Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 69-85.
|
Mustafa Aydın ve Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe, “İslam Örneğinde Küreselleşen Dünyada Kimliğe Dayalı Güvenlik Tehditleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 197-214.
|
Ole Waever, “Toplumsal Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 151-178.
|
Simon Dalby, “Güvenlik ve Çevre Bağlantılarına Yeniden Bakmak”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 179-195.
|
Ursula Oswald Spring, “Latin Amerika’da Barış Üzerine Doğulu, Avrupalı ve Yerli Düşünce”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18) 2008, 49-67.
|
Colin M. Fleming, “New or Old Wars ? Debating a Clausewitzian Future”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 32, No.2, April 2009, 213-241.
|
J. Frederik M. Arends, “Homeros’dan Hobbes ve Ötesine: Avrupa Geleneğinde “Güvenlik Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6 (22) 2009, 3-33.
|
Talip Küçükcan, “Terörün Sosyolojisi: Toplumsal Kökenleri Anlama İmkanı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6 (24) 2009, 33-54.
|
Burak Tangör ve Haldun Yalçınkaya, “Güvenlik Yönetişimi Çerçevesinde Özel Askeri Şirketler”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7 (25) 2010.
|
Pınar Bilgin,”Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Açılımlar: Yeni Güvenlik Çalışmaları”, Stratejik Araştırmalar, 8 (14), Ocak 2010, 69-96.
|
Ali Bilgiç, “ ‘Güvenlik İkilemi’ni Yeniden Düşünmek: Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Bir Perspektif”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8 (29) 2011, 123-142.
|
Ebru Ş. Canan-Sokullu, “Türk Kamuoyunda NATO Algısı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 151-182.
|
| Mustafa Aydın, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik Kavramsallaştırması”, içinde Mustafa Aydın ve vd. (eds.), Uluslararası İlişkilerde Çatışmadan Güvenliğe, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ekim 2012, 491-509. |
Salih Bıçakcı, “Yeni Savaş ve Siber Güvenlik Arasında NATO’nun Yeniden Doğuşu”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 205-226.
|
Şener Aktürk, “NATO Neden Genişledi? Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları Işığında NATO’nun Genişlemesi ve ABD-Rusya İç Siyaseti”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 73-97.
|
Tarık Oğuzlu, “NATO ve Türkiye: Dönüşen İttifakın Sorgulayan Üyesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 99-124.
|
Ali L. Karaosmanoğlu, “NATO’nun Dönüşümü”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 3-38.
|
Mitat Çelikpala, “Enerji Güvenliği: NATO’nun Yeni Tehdit Algısı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 75-99.
|
Mustafa Aydın ve Fulya Ereker, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik: Algı, Politika, Yapı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11 (43) 2014, 127-156.
|
Oğuz Dilek, “Constructing Security and Community in the Middle East: A Security Community Approach to the Structure and Agents of the Arab Spring”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11 (42) 2014, 51-74.
|
Salih Bıçakcı, “NATO’nun Gelişen Tehdit Algısı: 21.Yüzyılda Siber Güvenlik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 101-130.
|
Sıtkı Egeli, “Füze Tehdidi ve NATO Füze Kalkanı: Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 39-73.
|
Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe ve Cihan Dizdaroğlu, “NATO-AB İlişkilerinde İşbirliği ve Çatışma Dinamikleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 131-163.
|
Serhat Güvenç, “NATO’nun Evrimi ve Türkiye’nin Transatlantik Güvenliğe Katkıları”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 12 (45) 2015, 101-119.
|
Ali Nedim Karabulut, “Eski Savaş, Yeni Strateji: Rusya’nın Yirmibirinci Yüzyıldaki Hibrit Savaş Doktrini ve Ukrayna Krizi’ndeki Uygulaması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 13 (49) 2016, 25-42.
|
Klevis Kolasi, “Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi”, İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35, 2017.
|
Arda Bilgen, “Güvenliksiz Kalkınma, Kalkınmasız Güvenlik Mümkün mü? Güvenlik-Kalkınma İlişkisinin Dönüşüm Süreci ve Farklı Yaklaşımlarla Kavramsallaştırılması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (55) 2017, 19-40.
|
Başar Baysal ve Uluç Karakaş, “Climate Change and Security: Different Perceptions, Different Approaches”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (54) 2017, 21-44.
|
Levent Kırval ve Münir Süner, “Reforming the United Nations to Save the Planet: The Threat of Global Climate Change Making Reform Inevitable”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (54) 2017, 71-85.
|
Sıtkı Egeli, “Turkey Embarks Upon Ballistic Missiles: Why and How?”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (56) 2017, 3-22.
|
Ayşe Ömür Atmaca ve Pınar Gözen Ercan, “Uluslararası Güvenliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Feminist Eleştiriler”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15 (59) 2018, 19-31.
|
Mustafa Yağcı, “Rethinking Soft Power in Light of China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15 (57) 2018, 67-78.
|
