.

Bu sayfada listelenen makaleler, Proje Ekibi tarafından genel olarak “güvenlik” konusuna giriş düzeyinde okunması gerektiği düşünülen temel çalışmalar olarak seçilmiştir. Bu listeye eklenmesi veya çıkartılması gerektiğini düşündüğünüz makaleleri lütfen Katkıda Bulun formunu kullanarak bize iletiniz.

The articles listed on this page have been selected by the Project Team to represent basic introductory readings on “security” in general. Please let us know your recommendations to add or remove articles to/from this page on by filling out Contribution Form.

Nicholas J. Spykman, “Geography and Foreign Policy, I”, The American Political Science Review, 32 (1), 1938, 28-50.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1949029
Nicholas J. Spykman, “Geography and Foreign Policy, II”, The American Political Science Review, 32 (2), 1938, 213-236.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1948667
Albert Wohlstetter, “The Delicate Balance of Terror”, Foreign Affairs, 37(2) (1939): 211-234.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1959-01-01/delicate-balance-terror
Alexander Wendt, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, American Political Science Review, 88(2), 1944, 384-396.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2944711?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
X (George F. Kennan),“The Sources of Soviet Conduct, Foreign Affairs, 25(4) (1947): 566—82.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/1947-07-01/sources-soviet-conduct
Arnold Wolfers, “ ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, 67 (4), 1952, 481-502.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Hans J. Morgenthau, “Another “Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States’, The American Political Science Review, XLV1(4) (1952): 961-988.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/issue/AC5B965ECC802AAD1002B46585D76FA4
Ernest B. Haas, “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda”, World Politics, 5 (4), 1953, 442-477.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2009179?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Stanley H. Hoffmann, “International Relations: The Long Road to Theory”, World Politics, 11 (3), 1959, 346-377.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2009198
Kenneth N. Waltz ‘The Stability of a Bipolar World’, Daedalus, 93(3) (1964): 881-909.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/i20026857
Andre Beanfre ‘The Sharing of Nuclear Responsibilities: A Problem in Need of Solution’, International Affairs, 41(3) (1965): 411—19.
https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/41/3/411/2664680?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Hedley Bull, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach”, World Politics, 18 (3), 1966, 361-377.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2009761?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Henry A. Kissinger, “Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy”, Daedalus, 95 (2), 1966, 503-529.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026982?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Hedley Bull ‘Strategic Studies and Its Critics’, World Politics, 20(4) (1968): 593-605.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/issue/B4D1F9B5D9473F9EEF2C8F50D52A32B6
Hedley Bull ‘Arms Control and World Order’, International Security, 1(1) (1976): 3-16.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538573?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Stanley H. Hoffmann, “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, 106 (3), 1977, 41-60.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Jack L. Snyder ‘Rationality at the Brink: The Role of Cognitive Processes in Failures of Deterrence’, World Politics, 30(3) (1978): 345—65.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/rationality-at-the-brink-the-role-of-cognitive-processes-in-failures-of-deterrence/E21199B2A976388EEBECCD19387158C1
Robert Jervis ‘Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 30(2) (1978): 167-214.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/cooperation-under-the-security-dilemma/C8907431CCEFEFE762BFCA32F091C526
Robert Jervis ‘Why Nuclear Superiority Doesn’t Matter’, Political Science Quarterly, 94(4) (1979-80): 617—33.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2149629?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Colin S. Gray ‘Strategic Stability Reconsidered’, Dædalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 109(4) (1980): 135-534.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024700
John J. Weltman ‘Managing Nuclear Multipolarity’, International Security, 6(3) (1981-82): 182—94.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538613
Robert W. Cox, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 1981, 126-155.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Carl Sagan ‘Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe: Some Policy Implications’, Foreign Affairs, 62(2) (1983-84): 257-92.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1983-12-01/nuclear-war-and-climatic-catastrophe-some-policy-implications
Jack S. Levy, “Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems”, World Politics, 36(1), 1983, 76-99.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010176?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Richard H. Ullman ‘Redefining Security’, International Security, 8(1) (1983): 129-53.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538489?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Robert Jervis, “Deterrence and Perception”, International Security, 7(3), 1983, 3-30.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538549?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Robert W. Cox, “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 1983, 162-175.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298830120020701
Barry Buzan ‘Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case’, International Organization, 38(4) (1984): 597—624.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/economic-structure-and-international-security-the-limits-of-the-liberal-case/D0E8237975E196BA77CA4208DF193853

Barry Buzan, “Peace, Power and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations”, Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), 1984, 109-125.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/423935?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Charles L. Glaser ‘Why Even Good Defenses may be Bad’, International Security, 9(2) (1984): 92-123.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538669
Jack S. Levy ‘The Offensive/Defensive Balance of Military Technology: A Theoretical and Historical Analysis’, International Studies Quarterly, 28(2) (1984): 219-38.
https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/28/2/219/1799131?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Johan Galtung ‘Transarmament: From Offensive to Defensive Defense’, Journal of Peace Research, 21(2) (1984): 127-39.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002234338402100204
Mohammed Ayoob ‘Security in the Third World: The Worm About to Turn’, International Affairs, 60(1) (1984): 41—51.
https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/60/1/41/2406563?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Kenneth A. Oye,”Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies”, World Politics, 38(1), 1985, 1-24.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010349?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Robert Axelrod ve Robert O. Keohane, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”, World Politics, 38(1), 226-254.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010357?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Michael W.Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics”, The American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1986, 1151-1169.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Jack S. Levy, “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War”, World Politics, 40(1), 1987, 82-107.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010195?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 1988, 615-628.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/204817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Robert Gilpin, “The Theory of Hegemonic War”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 1988, 591-613.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/204816?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Simon Dalby ‘Geopolitical Discourse: The Soviet Union As Other’, Alternative, XI1X(4) (1988): 415-42.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/030437548801300401
William S. Lind, Nightengale, Keith, Schmitt, John F., Sutton, Joseph W. and Wilson, Gary I. ‘The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation’, Marine Corps Gazette (Oct. 1989), 22–6.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Changing-Face-of-War%3A-Into-the-Fourth-Lind-Nightengale/32bac89d6f6f2530d83ff81a0021bfb3ee591009
Bradley S. Klein ‘How the West was One: Representational Politics of NATO’, International Studies Quarterly, 34(3) (1990): 311-325.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600572?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Bruce M. Russett, Thomas Risse-Kappen, John Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future, Part III: Realism and Realities of European Security’, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 3, Winter 1990/91, pp 216-222.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538912?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Daniel Dendney ‘The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(3) (1990): 461—76.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298900190031001
John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War”, International Security, 15(1), 1990, 5-56.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538981?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Joseph S. Nye, Jr ‘Soft Power’, Foreign Policy, 80: 153—71.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1148580?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
R.B.J. Walkers ‘Security, Sovereignty, and the Challenge of World Politic, Alternatives, XV(1) (1990): 3-27.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644668?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Stanley Hoffman, Robert O. Keohane, John Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future, Part II: International Relations Theory and Post Cold War Europe’, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1990, pp. 191-199.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538869?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ken Booth ‘Security and Emancipation?’, Review of International Studies, 17(4) (1991): 313—26.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097269?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Stephen M. Walt ‘The Renaissance of Security Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 35(2) (1991): 211—39.
https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/35/2/211/1792023?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Thomas Risse-Kappen, “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies”, World Politics, 43(4), 1991, 479-512.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010534?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Edward A. Kolodziej ‘Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector’, International Studies Quarterly, 36(4) (1992): 421-38.
https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/36/4/421/1799201?redirectedFrom=fulltext
James M. Goldgeier and Michael McFaul ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organization, 46(2) (1992): 467—91.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706860
Woosang Kim, “Power Transitions and Great Power War from Westphalia to Waterloo”, World Politics, 45 (1), 1992, 153-172.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010522?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Barry R. Posen ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival, 35(1) (1993): 27—47.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00396339308442672
Kenneth N. Waltz ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, 18(2) (1993): 44—79.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539097?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Samuel P. Huntington ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’, Foreign Affairs, 72(3) (1993): 22—49.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20045621?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Antulio J. Echevarria II, ‘War and Politics: The Revolution in Military Affairs and the Continued Relevance of Clausewitz’, Joint Forces Quarterly (Winter 1995–96), 76–80.
https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=452700
Christopher Bassford and Edward J. Villacres, ‘Reclaiming the Clausewitzian Trinity’, Parameters 20 (3) (Autumn 1995), 9–19.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reclaiming-the-Clausewitzian-Trinity-Villacres-Bassford/15c0bdbba1f5613ff18ee366676d91ddbeeb9e46
David A. Baldwin ‘Security Studies and the End of the Cold War’, World Politics, 48(1) (1995): 117-41.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053954?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Emma Rothschild ‘What is Security’, Dædalus, 124(3) (1995): 53-98.
 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027310
John A. Vasquez, “Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction or Territoriality”, Journal of Peace Research, 32 (3), 1995, 277-293.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/425665?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Richard Price ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’, International Organization, 49(1) (1995): 73-103.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Barry R. Posen and Andrew L. Ross ‘Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy’, International Security, 21(3) (1996—97): 5—53.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539272?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Bill McSweeney ‘Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School’, Review of International Studies, 22(1) (1996): 81—93.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097432
Jutta Weldes ‘Constructing National Interests’, European Journal of International Relations, 2(3) (1996): 275-318.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354066196002003001
K.M. Fierke ‘Multiple Identities, Interfacing Games: The Social Construction of Western Action in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Relations, 2(4) (1996): 467-97.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354066196002004003
Keith Krause ‘Insecurity and State Formation in the Global Military Order: The Middle Eastern Case’, European Journal of International Relations, 2(3) (1996): 319—54.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354066196002003002
Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods”, Mershon International Studies Review, 40(2) (1996): 229-54.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/222776?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Emanuel Adler ‘Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2) (1997): 249-77.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03058298970260021101
John L. Gaddis, “History, Theory and Common Ground”, International Security, 22 (1), 1997, 75-85.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539330?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Richard K. Betts ‘Should Strategic Studies Survive?, World Politics, 50(1) (1997): 7-33.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054025?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Charles A. Kupchan ‘After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity’, International Security, 23(2) (1998): 40—79.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539379?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lawrence Freedman, ‘The Changing Forms of Military Conflict’, Survival 40 (4) (Winter 1998/99), 39–56.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1093/survival/40.4.39?needAccess=true
Michael C. Williams ‘Identity and the Politics of Security’, European Journal of International Relations, 4(2) (1998): 204—25.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066198004002003
Astri Subrke ‘Human Security and the Interests of States’, Security Dialogue, 30(3) (1999): 265—76.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010699030003002
Michael Howard, ‘When Are Wars Decisive?’ Survival 41 (1) (Spring 1999), 126–35.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1093/survival/41.1.126
Robert Jevis, “Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate”, International Security, 24(1), 1999, 42-63.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Samuel P. Huntington ‘The Lonely Superpower’, Foreign Affairs, 78(2) (1999): 35—49.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1999-03-01/lonely-superpower
Daniel Philpott, “The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations”, World Politics, 52 (2), 2000, 206-245.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054109?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Kenneth N. Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security, 25(1), 2000, 5-41.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Lene Hansen ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(2) (2000): 285-306.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03058298000290020501
William Walker ‘Nuclear Order and Disorder, International Affairs, 76(4) (2000): 703—24.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626455?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Caroline Thomas ‘Global Governance, Development and Human Security: Exploring the Links’, Third World Quarterly, 22(2) (2001): 159-75.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993404?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Roland Paris ‘Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air’, International Security, 26(2) (2001): 87—102.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3092123?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Didier Bigo ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critigue of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives, 27(Special Issue) (2002): 63-92.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03043754020270S105
Robert Kagan ‘Power and Weakness’, Policy Review, 113 (2002): 3-28.
https://carnegieendowment.org/2002/06/02/power-and-weakness-pub-985
Beril Dedeoğlu, “Yeniden Güvenlik Topluluğu: Benzerliklerin Karşıklı Bağımlılığından Farklılıkların Birlikteliğine”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2004, 1 (4), 1-21.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/yeniden-guvenlik-toplulugu-benzerliklerin-karsilikli-bagimliligindan-farkliliklarin-birlikteligine
Fulya A. Ereker, “İlkçağlardan Günümüze Haklı Savaş Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2004, 1 (3), 1-36.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/ilkcaglardan-gunumuze-hakli-savas-kavrami
Gilles Andréani ‘The “War on Terror”: Good Cause, Wrong Concept’, Survival, 46(4) (2004-05): 31-50.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00396330412331342446
J. Ann Tickner ‘Feminist Responses to International Security Studies’, Peace Review, 16(1) (2004): 43-48.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1040265042000210148
Mustafa Aydın, “Uluslararası İlişkilerin “Gerçekçi” Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, Bahar 2004, s. 33-60.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/uluslararasi-iliskilerin-gercekci-teorisi-kokeni-kapsami-kritigi
Robert L. Paarlberg ‘Knowledge as Power: Science, Military Dominance, and U.S. Security’, International Security, 29(1) (2004): 122—51.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137549
Tarak Barkawi ‘On the Pedagogy of “Small Wars’, International Affairs, 80(1) (2004): 19-37.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00363.x
James Der Derian ‘Imaging Terror: Logos, Pathos and Ethos’, Third World Quarterly, 26(1) (2005): 23-37.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993761
Sezai Özçelik, “The Theory And Practice Of Preventive Diplomacy: The Case Of Preventive Deployment In Macedonia”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2005, 3 (11), 103-128.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/the-theory-and-practice-of-preventive-diplomacy-the-case-of-preventive-deployment-in-macedonia-1
A. Şevket Ovalı, “Ütopya ile Pratik Arasında: Uluslararası İlişkilerde İnsan Güvenliği Kavramsallaştırılması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2006, 3 (10), 3-52.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/utopya-ile-pratik-arasinda-uluslararasi-iliskilerde-insan-guvenligi-kavramsallastirilmasi
Mark Neocleous ‘From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order’, Security Dialogue, 37(3) (2006): 363—84.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010606069061
Muzaffer Ercan Yılmaz, “Third-Party Intervention in International Conflicts: Peacekeeping and Peacemaking in the Post-Cold War Era”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2006, 3 (11), 25-44.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/third-party-intervention-in-international-conflicts-peacekeeping-and-peacemaking-in-the-post-cold-war-era-3
Stefan Elbe ‘Should HIV/AIDS Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security’, International Studies Quarterly, 50(1) (2006): 119—144.
 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693554
Ali Karaosmanoğlu, “Muhteşem Ortaklık: Kant ve Clausewitz,” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 4 (14) Yaz 2007, 161-183.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/muhtesem-ortaklik-kant-ve-clausewitz
Faruk Yalvaç, “Rousseau’nun Savaş ve Barış Kuramı: Adalet Olarak Barış”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2007, 4 (14), 121-160.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/rousseaunun-savas-ve-baris-kurami-adalet-olarak-baris
Friedrich Kratochwil, “Re-thinkinh the ‘inter’ in International Politics”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35(3), 2007, 495-511.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298070350030801
Hidemi Suganami, “Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt”, International Studies, 33(3), 2007, 511-530.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072190?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Muzaffer Ercan Yılmaz, “Westphalia’dan Günümüze Savaş”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2007, 4 (14), 17-38.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/westphaliadan-gunumuze-savas
Necati Polat, “Türkiye’de Barış Düşüncesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2007, 4 (14), 217-253.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/turkiyede-baris-dusuncesi
Richard Falk, “War and Peace in an Age of Terror and State Terrorism”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2007, 4 (14), 1-15.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/war-and-peace-in-an-age-of-terror-and-state-terrorism-1
Serdar Palabıyık, “Türkiye’de Savaş Düşüncesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2007, 4 (14), 185-215.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/turkiyede-savas-dusuncesi
Barry Buzan, “Askeri Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 107-123.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/askeri-guvenligin-degisen-gundemi
Björn Hettne, “Teori ve Pratikte Güvenliğin Bölgeselleşmesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 87-106.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/teori-ve-pratikte-guvenligin-bolgesellesmesi
Czeslaw Mesjasz, “Ekonomik Güvenlik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 125-150.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/ekonomik-guvenlik
Haldun Yalçınkaya, “Savaşlarda Asker-Medya İlişkilerinin Geldiği Son Aşama: İliştirilmiş Gazetecilik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (19), 29-56.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/savaslarda-asker-medya-iliskilerinin-geldigi-son-asama-ilistirilmis-gazetecilik
Hans Günter Brauch, “Reconceptualizing Security: Conceptual Quartet of Peace, Security, Development and Environment”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 1-47.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/reconceptualizing-security-conceptual-quartet-of-peace-security-development-and-environment
John Baylis, “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güvenlik Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 69-85.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/uluslararasi-iliskilerde-guvenlik-kavrami
Mustafa Aydın ve Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe, “İslam Örneğinde Küreselleşen Dünyada Kimliğe Dayalı Güvenlik Tehditleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 197-214.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/islam-orneginde-kuresellesen-dunyada-kimlige-dayali-guvenlik-tehditleri
Ole Waever, “Toplumsal Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 151-178.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/toplumsal-guvenligin-degisen-gundemi
Simon Dalby, “Güvenlik ve Çevre Bağlantılarına Yeniden Bakmak”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 179-195.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/guvenlik-ve-cevre-baglantilarina-yeniden-bakmak
Ursula Oswald Spring, “Latin Amerika’da Barış Üzerine Doğulu, Avrupalı ve Yerli Düşünce”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, 5 (18), 49-67.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/latin-ameika’da-baris-uzerine-dogulu-avrupali-ve-yerli-dusunce
Colin M. Fleming, “New or Old Wars ? Debating a Clausewitzian Future”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 32, No.2, April 2009, 213-241.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402390902743175
J. Frederik M. Arends, “Homeros’dan Hobbes ve Ötesine: Avrupa Geleneğinde “Güvenlik Kavramı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2009, 6 (22), 3-33.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/homeros’dan-hobbes-ve-otesine-“guvenlik”-kavraminin-avrupa-gelenegindeki-boyutlari
Talip Küçükcan, “Terörün Sosyolojisi: Toplumsal Kökenleri Anlama İmkanı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2009, 6 (24), 33-54.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/terorun-sosyolojisi-toplumsal-kokenleri-anlama-imkani
Burak Tangör ve Haldun Yalçınkaya, “Private Military Companies within the Perspective of Security Governance”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7 (25) 2010.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/private-military-companies-within-the-perspective-of-security-governance
Pınar Bilgin,”Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Açılımlar: Yeni Güvenlik Çalışmaları,” Stratejik Araştırmalar, 8 (14) Ocak 2010, 69-96.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285521029_Guvenlik_Calismalarinda_Yeni_Acilimlar_Yeni_Guvenlik_Calismalari
Ali Bilgiç, “ ‘Güvenlik İkilemi’ni Yeniden Düşünmek: Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Bir Perspektif”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2011, 8 (29), 123-142.
 https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/“guvenlik-ikilemi”ni-yeniden-dusunmek-guvenlik-calismalarinda-yeni-bir-perspektif
Ebru Ş. Canan-Sokullu, “Türk Kamuoyunda NATO Algısı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 151-182.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/turk-kamuoyunda-nato-algisi
Mustafa Aydın, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik Kavramsallaştırması”, içinde Mustafa Aydın ve vd. (eds.), Uluslararası İlişkilerde Çatışmadan Güvenliğe, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ekim 2012, 491-509.
Salih Bıçakcı, “Yeni Savaş ve Siber Güvenlik Arasında NATO’nun Yeniden Doğuşu”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 205-226.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/yeni-savas-ve-siber-guvenlik-arasinda-nato’nun-yeniden-dogusu
Şener Aktürk, “NATO Neden Genişledi? Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları Işığında NATO’nun Genişlemesi ve ABD-Rusya İç Siyaseti”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 73-97.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato-neden-genisledi-uluslararasi-iliskiler-kuramlari-isiginda-nato’nun-genislemesi-ve-abd-rusya-ic-siyaseti
Tarık Oğuzlu, “NATO ve Türkiye: Dönüşen İttifakın Sorgulayan Üyesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 9 (34) 2012, 99-124.
https://www.uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato-ve-turkiye-donusen-ittifakin-sorgulayan-uyesi
Ali L. Karaosmanoğlu, “NATO’nun Dönüşümü”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 3-38.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato’nun-donusumu
Mitat Çelikpala, “Enerji Güvenliği: NATO’nun Yeni Tehdit Algısı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 75-99.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/enerji-guvenligi-nato’nun-yeni-tehdit-algisi
Mustafa Aydın ve Fulya Ereker, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik: Algı, Politika, Yapı”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11 (43) 2014, 127-156.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/turkiye’de-guvenlik-algi-politika-yapi
Oğuz Dilek, “Constructing Security and Community in the Middle East: A Security Community Approach to the Structure and Agents of the Arab Spring”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11 (42) 2014, 51-74.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/constructing-security-and-community-in-the-middle-east-a-security-community-approach-to-the-structure-and-agents-of-the-arab-spring
Salih Bıçakcı, “NATO’nun Gelişen Tehdit Algısı: 21.Yüzyılda Siber Güvenlik”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 101-130.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato’nun-gelisen-tehdit-algisi-21-yuzyilda-siber-guvenlik
Sıtkı Egeli, “Füze Tehdidi ve NATO Füze Kalkanı: Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 39-73.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/fuze-tehdidi-ve-nato-fuze-kalkani-turkiye-acisindan-bir-degerlendirme
Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe ve Cihan Dizdaroğlu, “NATO-AB İlişkilerinde İşbirliği ve Çatışma Dinamikleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10 (40) 2014, 131-163.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato-ab-iliskilerinde-isbirligi-ve-catisma-dinamikleri
Serhat Güvenç, “NATO’nun Evrimi ve Türkiye’nin Transatlantik Güvenliğe Katkıları”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 12 (45) 2015, 101-119.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/nato’nun-evrimi-ve-turkiye’nin-transatlantik-guvenlige-katkilari
Ali Nedim Karabulut, “Eski Savaş, Yeni Strateji: Rusya’nın Yirmibirinci Yüzyıldaki Hibrit Savaş Doktrini ve Ukrayna Krizi’ndeki Uygulaması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 13 (49) 2016, 25-42.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/eski-savas-yeni-strateji-rusya’nin-yirmibirinci-yuzyildaki-hibrit-savas-doktrini-ve-ukrayna-krizi’ndeki-uygulamasi
Klevis Kolasi, “Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi”, İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35, 2017.
https://bit.ly/2m5AZrR
Arda Bilgen, “Güvenliksiz Kalkınma, Kalkınmasız Güvenlik Mümkün mü? Güvenlik-Kalkınma İlişkisinin Dönüşüm Süreci ve Farklı Yaklaşımlarla Kavramsallaştırılması”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (55) 2017, 19-40.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/guvenliksiz-kalkinma-kalkinmasiz-guvenlik-mumkun-mu-guvenlik-kalkinma-iliskisinin-donusum-sureci-ve-farkli-yaklasimlarla-kavramsallastirilmasi
Başar Baysal ve Uluç Karakaş, “Climate Change and Security: Different Perceptions, Different Approaches”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (54) 2017, 21-44.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/climate-change-and-security-different-perceptions-different-approaches
Levent Kırval ve Münir Süner, “Reforming the United Nations to Save the Planet: The Threat of Global Climate Change Making Reform Inevitable”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (54) 2017, 71-85.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/reforming-the-united-nations-to-save-the-planet-the-threat-of-global-climate-change-making-reform-inevitable
Sıtkı Egeli, “Turkey Embarks Upon Ballistic Missiles: Why and How?”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14 (56) 2017, 3-22.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/turkey-embarks-upon-ballistic-missiles-why-and-how
Ayşe Ömür Atmaca ve Pınar Gözen Ercan, “Uluslararası Güvenliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Feminist Eleştiriler”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15 (59) 2018, 19-31.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/uluslararasi-guvenligi-yeniden-dusunmek-uluslararasi-iliskiler-disiplininde-feminist-elestiriler
Mustafa Yağcı, “Rethinking Soft Power in Light of China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15 (57) 2018, 67-78.
https://uidergisi.com.tr/yazilar/rethinking-soft-power-in-light-of-china’s-belt-and-road-initiative